Who is it more profitable to work with: partners, who offer a good price, but are only prepared to take one part of the project, or a company, who take a little more for the same piece of work, but provides a full range of services? It’s a real issue in the sphere of contract bottling. One can only find the answer to this after analysing hidden aspects of cooperation and its possibilities.
Who is it more profitable to work with: partners, who offer a good price, but are only prepared to take one part of the project, or a company, who take a little more for the same piece of work, but provides a full range of services? It’s a real issue in the sphere of contract bottling. One can only find the answer to this after analysing hidden aspects of cooperation and its possibilities.
This isn’t the only benefit. An order ‘under key’ affords one maximum control over quality. To keep quality management in their hands, linking contractors among themselves, seems possible only at first glance. The responsibility is blurred, and the duties of one contractor to another do not often fit. A single quality standard, observed by the producer at all stages of the order, from purchase of raw materials to delivery of goods, is more reliable. One can be sure that everything is completed consistently, consciously, and that the manufacturer is aware that the quality of the finished product fully reflects the level of their professionalism.
Building a relationship with a trusted contractor is a strategical issue. In this sense even the highest class of producer who has limitations in their possibilities, loses to a competitor, who offers a full range of services. After all, the next order may require different parameters. For example, the aim might be to rapidly produce, produce a drink of another category or produce a large quantity. It’s better to immediately build a relationship with a partner who are not only suited to the current situation, but also to any new ambitious plans.
